Ferae naturae: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "In {{tag|Latin}}, “by its nature, wild”. To be contrasted with animals mansuetae naturae, animals are, in the immortal words of Darling, J., in {{casenote|Manton|Broc...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
To be contrasted with animals [[mansuetae naturae]], animals are, in the immortal words of Darling, J., in {{casenote|Manton|Brocklebank}}: | To be contrasted with animals [[mansuetae naturae]], animals are, in the immortal words of Darling, J., in {{casenote|Manton|Brocklebank}}: | ||
{{Quote|those ''[[ferae naturae]]'', e.g. [[tiger]]s and [[lion]]s which a man keeps at his peril.}} | {{Quote|... those ''[[ferae naturae]]'', e.g. [[tiger]]s and [[lion]]s which a man keeps at his peril.}} | ||
A chap who keeps lions and tigers does so at his peril, and should they escape and cause damage to (for which, presumably, read “eat”) his [[neighbor]] the ordinary principles of {{casnote|Rylands|Fletcher}} will apply. | |||
In fact as I recall the escaping water in Rylands|Fletcher was actually classified, in the eyes of the law, as a wild animal. But I might be misremembering. | |||
{{C|egg}} | |||
Revision as of 14:23, 4 November 2016
In Latin, “by its nature, wild”.
To be contrasted with animals mansuetae naturae, animals are, in the immortal words of Darling, J., in Manton v Brocklebank:
... those ferae naturae, e.g. tigers and lions which a man keeps at his peril.
A chap who keeps lions and tigers does so at his peril, and should they escape and cause damage to (for which, presumably, read “eat”) his neighbor the ordinary principles of Template:Casnote will apply.
In fact as I recall the escaping water in Rylands|Fletcher was actually classified, in the eyes of the law, as a wild animal. But I might be misremembering.