Fish or cut bait: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Use it or lose it. When you have a good maul going forward, but momentum stalls, and it looks like someone might have their hands on your ball, the referee might call fish or...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Use it or lose it. When you have a good maul going forward, but momentum stalls, and it looks like someone might have their hands on your ball, the referee might call fish or cut bait to stop your [[additional termination even]] hanging on indefinitely and freaking your client out.
{{anat|PB}}
“Use it or lose it”, to use an easier vernacular.  
 
When you have a good maul going forward, but momentum stalls, and it looks like someone might have their hands on your ball, the referee might call fish or cut bait to stop your [[additional termination event]] hanging on indefinitely and freaking your client out.


So, for example, you would have to exercise your rights following a [[NAV trigger]] within, say, 30 days.
So, for example, you would have to exercise your rights following a [[NAV trigger]] within, say, 30 days.


Fish or cut bait clauses are a pain because the cut-off time is inevitably arbitrary, will be ambiguous (30 days from the event, or when you were actually aware of the event, or when you ought reasonably to have been aware of the event and so on — go on, shoot me now), and undoubtedly some bright spark will want to have a grace period and so on.
'''Fish or cut bait''' clauses are a pain on the proverbial because the cut-off time is inevitably arbitrary, will be ambiguous (30 days from the event, or when you were actually aware of the event, or when you ought reasonably to have been aware of the event and so on), and undoubtedly some bright spark will want to have a grace period, and in any case will contrive enough confusion, angst and resentment to delay the closing of the deal for three weeks.
 
Since no-one exercises [[NAV triggers]] anyway - well - have ''you'' ever? You are best to just shoot yourself, before the negotiation starts.

Revision as of 15:14, 4 September 2017

Hedge Funds & Prime Brokerage Anatomy™

{{{2}}}

There is no industry standard prime brokerage agreement, so this is not so much an anatomy as a collection of resources about an amorphous subject.
Hedge fund | AIFMD | Depositary | Prime broker | prime brokerage agreement | synthetic prime brokerage | margin lending | custody asset | CASS Anatomy | reuse & rehypothecation | hedge fund | leveraged alpha | greeks | short selling Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.


“Use it or lose it”, to use an easier vernacular.

When you have a good maul going forward, but momentum stalls, and it looks like someone might have their hands on your ball, the referee might call fish or cut bait to stop your additional termination event hanging on indefinitely and freaking your client out.

So, for example, you would have to exercise your rights following a NAV trigger within, say, 30 days.

Fish or cut bait clauses are a pain on the proverbial because the cut-off time is inevitably arbitrary, will be ambiguous (30 days from the event, or when you were actually aware of the event, or when you ought reasonably to have been aware of the event and so on), and undoubtedly some bright spark will want to have a grace period, and in any case will contrive enough confusion, angst and resentment to delay the closing of the deal for three weeks.

Since no-one exercises NAV triggers anyway - well - have you ever? You are best to just shoot yourself, before the negotiation starts.