Fruits of the contract: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Not what you think it is. Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''double entendre'' bypass, were thinking only of the benefit one expects to accrue...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not what you think it is. | {{a|glossary|{{carbs}}}}Not what you think it is. | ||
Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''[[double entendre]]'' bypass, were thinking only of the benefit one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his legally binding promises to you. | Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''[[double entendre]]'' bypass, were thinking only of the [[Consideration|benefit]] one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his [[Contract|legally binding promises]] to you. | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Frutti di bosco]] | |||
{{draft}} | |||
{{egg}} | |||
Latest revision as of 14:41, 12 May 2020
|
Not what you think it is.
Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a double entendre bypass, were thinking only of the benefit one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his legally binding promises to you.