81,821
edits
Governed by and interpreted in accordance with: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Governed by and interpreted in accordance with (view source)
Revision as of 10:05, 23 July 2021
, 23 July 2021no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The legal experts of one sovereign judiciary applying the laws of another one might strike you as rather a wishful state of affairs, and it rather points up the need for the grim confection with which we are currently concerned. | The legal experts of one sovereign judiciary applying the laws of another one might strike you as rather a wishful state of affairs, and it rather points up the need for the grim confection with which we are currently concerned. | ||
For it is hard enough to expect ''le Cour Supérieur de Justice'' to properly apply the law of, for example, [[Trust|trusts]], when the very concept is ''said to be''<ref>''Said'' to be. The ''[[contrat fiduciaire]]'' sounds a ''lot'' like a trust to me, readers.</ref> unknown to | For it is hard enough to expect ''le Cour Supérieur de Justice'' to properly apply the law of, for example, [[Trust|trusts]], when the very concept is ''said to be''<ref>''Said'' to be. The ''[[contrat fiduciaire]]'' sounds a ''lot'' like a trust to me, readers.</ref> unknown to its jurisprudence, without it at least putting some kind of Flemish spin on it. It cannot ''help'' reading our rusty Anglo-Saxon contortions with some silken, romance finery. | ||
Will it help if our contract says | Will it help if our contract says it is not allowed to? We fear not. Directing a reader on the [[Hermeneutics|hermeneutic]] framework she must use to construe a document ''from within the confines of that document'' rather puts the Yak before the ''сарлаг тэрэг'', to coin a phrase. | ||
But — and this is a far broader question — ''what does it matter anyway?'' What are we supposed to ''do'' if the sitting members of ''le Tribunal d’Arrondissement'' puts some Frankish spin on things? How will we even know? How can we stop them? To whom do we appeal? What difference will it make? | But — and this is a far broader question — ''what does it matter anyway?'' | ||
What are we supposed to ''do'' if the sitting members of ''le Tribunal d’Arrondissement'' puts some Frankish spin on things? How will we even know? How can we stop them? To whom do we appeal? What difference will it make? | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||