Head of the documentation unit: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


Because this is what the doc unit means:
Because this is what the doc unit means:
*To the business: WHERE'S MY GODDAMN ISDA?
*To [[sales]]: WHERE'S MY GODDAMN ISDA?
*To the Chief Operating Officer: Why does this cost so much and who the hell are all these people?
*To the [[chief operating officer]]: Why does this cost so much and who the hell are all these people?
*To the General Counsel: A PAIN IN THE ARSE.
*To the [[general counsel]]: A PAIN IN THE ARSE.
*To a change manger: OFFSHORE THAT SUCKER TO INDIA!
*To a [[change manger]]: OFFSHORE THAT SUCKER TO INDIA!


An investment bank being a place of universal grasping fixation on advancement, it isn't hard to find a stooge to take the role: all you have to do is present it as a [[stretch assignment]]; an opportunity for advancement: managing three hundred people, in six centres across seven time zones, with a chance to overhaul and rock the house on a franchise-critical operational function. Who would not leap at that?
In an [[investment bank]], being a place of universal grasping fixation on advancement, it isn't hard to find a stooge to take the role: all you have to do is present it as a [[stretch assignment]]; an opportunity for advancement: managing three hundred people, in six centres across seven time zones, with a chance to overhaul and rock the house on a franchise-critical operational function. Who would not leap at that?


A person with a cautious or reflective nature. That's who.
A person with a cautious or reflective nature. That's who.

Revision as of 18:44, 23 February 2017

See also the Northern Ireland portfolio in the nineteen seventies.

One of the accursed people in an Investment Bank, the head of the docs unit is only in the role to atone for a sin (possibly one committed in a former life), or as act of spite, vengeance or perverse cruelty from someone else further up the organisation.

Running the negotiators is an utterly thankless role, one totally bereft of thanks, which - because of its cost, heft, and inevitable negative impact on the franchise, is irresistible fodder for change managers, management consultants, and people who think a “chief operating officer” is a fine thing to aspire to, to fiddle with. Which means any well-meaning attempts you make to fix things are bound to fail, and fail in a way that is inextribably tied to you.

Because this is what the doc unit means:

In an investment bank, being a place of universal grasping fixation on advancement, it isn't hard to find a stooge to take the role: all you have to do is present it as a stretch assignment; an opportunity for advancement: managing three hundred people, in six centres across seven time zones, with a chance to overhaul and rock the house on a franchise-critical operational function. Who would not leap at that?

A person with a cautious or reflective nature. That's who.