Headings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|contract|{{subtable|'''Sample''':<br>“Headings are for ease of reference only and shall be ignored in construing this Agreement”}}What is it that the legal eagle s...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|contract|{{subtable|'''Sample''':<br>“Headings are for ease of reference only and shall be ignored in construing this Agreement”}}What is it that the [[legal eagle]] so distrusts about headings? | {{a|contract|{{subtable|'''Sample''':<br>“Headings are for ease of reference only and shall be ignored in construing this Agreement”}}}}What is it that the [[legal eagle]] so distrusts about headings? | ||
If you are anything like the [[JC]] the headings are the only part of | If you are anything like the [[JC]], the [[headings]] are the only part of the contract you ''do'', with any regularity, read. They orient; they provide a superstructure; they provide ''context'' in a world so crushingly bereft of it. So why exclude them from your semantic consideration? We are at a loss. At best to do so provides a cover to pernicious arguments a miscreant might raise at a later stage to justify enforcing, or resisting, a contractual provision the ''context'' indicated was meant for another purpose altogether. |
Revision as of 11:40, 27 October 2020
What is it that the legal eagle so distrusts about headings?
If you are anything like the JC, the headings are the only part of the contract you do, with any regularity, read. They orient; they provide a superstructure; they provide context in a world so crushingly bereft of it. So why exclude them from your semantic consideration? We are at a loss. At best to do so provides a cover to pernicious arguments a miscreant might raise at a later stage to justify enforcing, or resisting, a contractual provision the context indicated was meant for another purpose altogether.