Hypothetical: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
A tap on the nose, a knowing look and a wise expression which says, “''precisely'', my dear fellow. ''Precisely''” .
A tap on the nose, a knowing look and a wise expression which says, “''precisely'', my dear fellow. ''Precisely''” .


[[Hypothetical]]s hail from the same bank of the River Pedantry as “[[equivalence]]” — or should we say, they hail from a bank equal to the same bank as equivalence (it seems only fair) — and often are promptly followed by a vigorous bout of [[deem]]ing.
[[Hypothetical]]s hail from the same bank of the River Pedantry as “[[equivalence]]” — or should we say, they hail from a bank [[Fungible|fungible with]] the same bank as [[equivalence]] (it seems only fair) — and often are promptly followed by a vigorous bout of [[deem]]ing.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Revision as of 10:58, 14 November 2020

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Plausible deniability.

A lawyer’s “scare quotes” that say, “we didn’t have this conversation, and if you claim that we did, I will deny all knowledge. But as we both know, we did. But, as far as the boss is concerned, I we didn’t.”

“Didn’t what?”

A tap on the nose, a knowing look and a wise expression which says, “precisely, my dear fellow. Precisely” .

Hypotheticals hail from the same bank of the River Pedantry as “equivalence” — or should we say, they hail from a bank fungible with the same bank as equivalence (it seems only fair) — and often are promptly followed by a vigorous bout of deeming.

See also