If you can manage a risk entirely by algorithm, you have eliminated it: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Courtesy of the syllogism beginning {{maxim|A risk you have eliminated is not a risk}} this is less of a good thing than it sounds. A risk you have eliminated has no value, and your compliance cost in monitoring it is wasted. Unless you have only eliminated it ''because'' you are monitoring it — [[Schrodinger]], hello! — in which case well played, madam: you have just bought yourself a compliance cost for nothing.
Courtesy of the syllogism beginning {{maxim|A risk you have eliminated is not a risk}}, this is less of a good thing than it sounds. A risk you have eliminated has no value, and your compliance cost in monitoring it is wasted. Unless you have only eliminated it ''because'' you are monitoring it — [[Schrodinger]], hello! — in which case well played, madam: you have just bought yourself a compliance cost for nothing.
 
{{maxim|A risk you have eliminated is not a risk}}<br>
{{maxim|Without risk, there is no return}}<br>
{{maxim|If you can manage a risk entirely by algorithm, you have eliminated it}}
 
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Risk]]
*[[Risk]]

Revision as of 15:07, 9 September 2019

Courtesy of the syllogism beginning A risk you have eliminated is not a risk, this is less of a good thing than it sounds. A risk you have eliminated has no value, and your compliance cost in monitoring it is wasted. Unless you have only eliminated it because you are monitoring it — Schrodinger, hello! — in which case well played, madam: you have just bought yourself a compliance cost for nothing.

A risk you have eliminated is not a risk
Without risk, there is no return
If you can manage a risk entirely by algorithm, you have eliminated it

See also

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=If_you_can_manage_a_risk_entirely_by_algorithm,_you_have_eliminated_it&oldid=32885"