Inhouse counsel: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|people||[[File:Legal eagle.jpg|450px|thumb|center|A [[legal eagle]] yesterday.]]}}{{d|Inhouse counsel|/ˈɪnhaʊs ˈkaʊns(ə)l/|n|}}
{{a|people|[[File:Legal eagle.jpg|450px|thumb|center|A [[legal eagle]] yesterday.]]}}{{d|Inhouse counsel|/ˈɪnhaʊs ˈkaʊns(ə)l/|n|}}


A peculiar breed of [[flannelwright]] whose chief expertise resides in:
A peculiar breed of [[flannelwright]] whose chief expertise resides in:

Revision as of 10:49, 12 October 2021

People Anatomy™
A spotter’s guide to the men and women of finance.
A legal eagle yesterday.
Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Inhouse counsel
/ˈɪnhaʊs ˈkaʊns(ə)l/ (n.)

A peculiar breed of flannelwright whose chief expertise resides in:

(i) knowing enough about the law to frame a sensible question about it for someone else, but disclaiming enough knowledge to competently answer the question by herself; and
(ii) having the tactical acumen to throw just such a hospital pass without anyone twigging that she has done it.

You can find detailed criteria — what it takes to excel at the job of steering emails — here.

The person who proves best at this behaviour over a sustained period of time gets to be general counsel.

See also