Law of equity: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Amwelladmin moved page Chancery Division to Law of equity)
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}Nowadays taking bodily form in the shape of the [[Chancery Division]] of the [[High Court of Justice]] of England and Wales, the [[courts of chancery]] were the originators of the principles of {{t|equity}}, that great rug of English jurisprudence under which, for hundreds of years, jurists have swept the vicissitudes of a rigid, or [[Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited - Case Note|stupid]], application of the law of {{tag|contract}}.
{{a|trust|}}Nowadays taking bodily form in the shape of the [[Chancery Division]] of the [[High Court of Justice]] of England and Wales, the [[courts of chancery]] were the originators of the principles of {{t|equity}}, that great rug of English jurisprudence under which, for hundreds of years, jurists have swept the vicissitudes of a rigid, or [[Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited - Case Note|stupid]], application of the law of {{tag|contract}}.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Latest revision as of 14:02, 16 October 2023

Trusts, fiduciaries and matters of equity
When the common law goes a bit runny at the edges™


Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Nowadays taking bodily form in the shape of the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, the courts of chancery were the originators of the principles of equity, that great rug of English jurisprudence under which, for hundreds of years, jurists have swept the vicissitudes of a rigid, or stupid, application of the law of contract.

See also