Legaltech: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
2. (''Contrarian usage'') ''Not'' [[chat-bot]]s, {{t|AI}}, [[metadata extraction]], fuzzy logic or [[semantic syntactical parsing|reg tech]] or [[blockchain]]. Instead, the [[Code: Version 2.0|code]] that lawyers are trained in how to programme from their first day at law school: '''[[words]]'''.
2. (''Contrarian usage'') ''Not'' [[chat-bot]]s, {{t|AI}}, [[metadata extraction]], fuzzy logic or [[semantic syntactical parsing|reg tech]] or [[blockchain]]. Instead, the [[Code: Version 2.0|code]] that lawyers are trained in how to programme from their first day at law school: '''[[words]]'''.


We have mapped out the [[legal tech landscape]], at least insofar as it maps onto the commercial contracting process, [[Legal tech landscape|here]].
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
* [[Legal tech landscape]]
*[[A faster horse]]
*[[A faster horse]]
*{{br|Code: Version 2.0}}
*{{br|Code: Version 2.0}}

Revision as of 15:22, 5 October 2021

The JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
I have never been able to find out for sure whether Smalt was a wind up. But it must have been.


Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Legal tech
/ˈliːgəl//tɛk/ (n.)

1. (Vogue usage) Information technology that assists in the provision of or, more likely, delivery of, legal services. In these pages used interchangeably with “reg tech”. Both quite disappointing.

2. (Contrarian usage) Not chat-bots, AI, metadata extraction, fuzzy logic or reg tech or blockchain. Instead, the code that lawyers are trained in how to programme from their first day at law school: words.

We have mapped out the legal tech landscape, at least insofar as it maps onto the commercial contracting process, here.

See also