Limitation Act 1980: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*'''Tort''': An action founded on tort shall not be brought after the expiration of '''six years''' from the date on which the cause of action accrued: Section 2. | *'''Tort''': An action founded on tort shall not be brought after the expiration of '''six years''' from the date on which the cause of action accrued: Section 2. | ||
*'''Contract''': Claims on a simple contract are limited to '''six years''' from the date the [[cause of action]] accrued: Section 5. | *'''Contract''': Claims on a [[simple contract]] are limited to '''six years''' from the date the [[cause of action]] accrued: Section 5. | ||
*'''Defamation and malicious falsehood''': no such action shall be brought after the expiration of '''one year''' from the date on which the cause of action accrued. | *'''Defamation and malicious falsehood''': no such action shall be brought after the expiration of '''one year''' from the date on which the cause of action accrued. | ||
See the act for more tedious detail about what happens in the case of personal injury or death. | See the act for more tedious detail about what happens in the case of personal injury or death. | ||
===Simple contracts=== | |||
{{simplecontract}}“[[Simple contract]]”s is not defined, but the context of a [[Limitation Act]] puts it in contrast to payment claims under [[insurance contract]]s — perhaps not simple because of the dutyof utmost good faith implied in them — who knows? — and under certain loans, being those which: | |||
*do not have a fixed repayment date, ''[[and]]'' | |||
*do not make the repayment obligation [[Condition precedent|conditional]] on a demand for repayment”. So, a revolving credit facility, or perhaps even a bank deposit. | |||
This was designed to ameliorate the [[common law]] position<ref>{{cite1|Re Brown’s Estate|1893]|2Ch|300}}, that a loan repayable on demand or without a specific repayment date is treated as being repayable immediately, and the [[limitation period]] runs from the day it is advanced. This is an utterly bonkers decision, by the way. It means if you ask for repayment on the day before the limitation period kicks in you must immediately launch court proceedings to recover it. | |||
Anyway, all fixed now: If you don’t have an obligation to repay the money at a particular time, absent a demand, the [[limitation period]] only starts to run from the date of demand. | |||
===Reform=== | |||
Lots of good fun, particularly in the area of latent defects in the construction of houses, for forensic examination of precisely when a cause of action accrues, of course. The [[Limitation Act 1980]] was the subject of a 320 page law commission monograph in 2015 — [http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/app/uploads/2015/03/lc270_Limitation_of_Actions.pdf knock yourself out] — so clearly ''someone'' sees the opportunity to change the law. | Lots of good fun, particularly in the area of latent defects in the construction of houses, for forensic examination of precisely when a cause of action accrues, of course. The [[Limitation Act 1980]] was the subject of a 320 page law commission monograph in 2015 — [http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/app/uploads/2015/03/lc270_Limitation_of_Actions.pdf knock yourself out] — so clearly ''someone'' sees the opportunity to change the law. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
Revision as of 12:39, 7 November 2019
|
|
Not to be confused with that monstrous eulogy to Schadenfreude, the statue of limitations.
The Limitation Act 1980, known fondly as the statute of limitations, is a piece of UK legislation dealing with limitations on legal claims under contracts, tort and so on.
- Tort: An action founded on tort shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued: Section 2.
- Contract: Claims on a simple contract are limited to six years from the date the cause of action accrued: Section 5.
- Defamation and malicious falsehood: no such action shall be brought after the expiration of one year from the date on which the cause of action accrued.
See the act for more tedious detail about what happens in the case of personal injury or death.
Simple contracts
Under the Limitation Act 1980 a “Simple contract” is one that is neither a “specialty”[1] nor an insurance contract[2] nor a “contract of loan” which has no fixed repayment date, where repayment is not conditional on a demand, [warning:strap yourselves in for this next bit]
“except where, in connection with taking the loan, the debtor enters into any collateral obligation to pay the amount of the debt or any part of it (as, for example, by delivering a promissory note as security for the debt) on terms which would exclude the application of this section to the contract of loan if they applied directly to repayment of the debt.”
We quote that last bit in full because, for a short extract, it is bloody hard to decipher. There are no explanatory notes to the Limitation Act 1980, but for help we have that Law Commission bunker buster which says:
“Section 6 does not apply where the debtor enters into a collateral obligation to pay the amount of the debt or any part of it on a fixed or determinable date or conditional on a demand for repayment (or other condition).”
So if the promissory note itself is a demand loan, but it is pledged as collateral for another debt which isn’t, then it counts as having a payment date. That’s the best I can do.
Note: “repayment on a stated maturity date, conditional upon demand by the creditor”, sounds a lot like the process for redeeming a bond — at least when held in physical, definitive form. Thus, definitive debt securities are not simple contracts.
Whether this is true of electronically cleared debt securities — that is, ahhh — all of them, these days — is a an interesting question, as these are paid out automatically to account holders in clearing systems.“Simple contract”s is not defined, but the context of a Limitation Act puts it in contrast to payment claims under insurance contracts — perhaps not simple because of the dutyof utmost good faith implied in them — who knows? — and under certain loans, being those which:
- do not have a fixed repayment date, and
- do not make the repayment obligation conditional on a demand for repayment”. So, a revolving credit facility, or perhaps even a bank deposit.
This was designed to ameliorate the common law position<ref>Re Brown’s Estate [1893]] 2Ch 300[3], that a loan repayable on demand or without a specific repayment date is treated as being repayable immediately, and the limitation period runs from the day it is advanced. This is an utterly bonkers decision, by the way. It means if you ask for repayment on the day before the limitation period kicks in you must immediately launch court proceedings to recover it.
Anyway, all fixed now: If you don’t have an obligation to repay the money at a particular time, absent a demand, the limitation period only starts to run from the date of demand.
Reform
Lots of good fun, particularly in the area of latent defects in the construction of houses, for forensic examination of precisely when a cause of action accrues, of course. The Limitation Act 1980 was the subject of a 320 page law commission monograph in 2015 — knock yourself out — so clearly someone sees the opportunity to change the law.
See also
- ↑ A written document like a security deed that has been sealed, delivered and given as security for the payment of a specific debt.
- ↑ Perhaps not “simple” because of the implied duty of utmost good faith — who knows?
- ↑ Let me Google that for you