Lord Justice Waller: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|people|}}The retired court of appeal judge who in a [https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff8c360d03e7f57ecccd9 judgment in 1998], and therefore as a matter of stare...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|people|}}The retired court of appeal judge who in a [https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff8c360d03e7f57ecccd9 judgment in 1998], | {{a|people|}}The retired court of appeal judge who held in a [https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff8c360d03e7f57ecccd9 judgment in 1998] that “The Smiths were a very successful pop group”. As far as we know the issue has not been subsequently considered so, as a matter of [[stare decisis]] (or at least ''[[obiter dicta]]'', therefore at the least persuasive throughout the commonwealth) it is the law of the land. | ||
Also gave the leading, [[pronoun]]-mangling judgment in {{casenote|Lloyds Bank|Independent Insurance}}. | Also gave the leading, [[pronoun]]-mangling judgment in the leading [[stupid banker]] case of {{casenote|Lloyds Bank|Independent Insurance}}. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
{{casenote|Lloyds Bank|Independent Insurance}} | {{casenote|Lloyds Bank|Independent Insurance}} | ||
*[[Pronoun]] | |||
*[[Pronoun angst]] | |||
Latest revision as of 08:17, 21 February 2021
|
People Anatomy™
A spotter’s guide to the men and women of finance.
|
The retired court of appeal judge who held in a judgment in 1998 that “The Smiths were a very successful pop group”. As far as we know the issue has not been subsequently considered so, as a matter of stare decisis (or at least obiter dicta, therefore at the least persuasive throughout the commonwealth) it is the law of the land.
Also gave the leading, pronoun-mangling judgment in the leading stupid banker case of Lloyds Bank v Independent Insurance.