Loss of profits: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Removed redirect to Consequential loss)
Tag: Removed redirect
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}''Not'' the same thing as [[consequential loss]], though in many cases it is a type of consequential loss. It is possible for it to be a direct loss.
{{g}}''Not'' the same thing as [[consequential loss]], though in many cases it is a type of consequential loss. It is possible for a [[loss of profits]] or [[loss of opportunity]] to be a direct loss, although the great case of {{casenote|Hadley|Baxendale}} illustrates that is by no means the ordinary run of things.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*{{casenote|Hadley|Baxendale}}
*{{casenote|Hadley|Baxendale}}
*[[Remoteness of damage]]
*[[Remoteness of damage]]
*[[Breach of contract]]
*[[Breach of contract]]

Revision as of 14:17, 18 December 2019

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Not the same thing as consequential loss, though in many cases it is a type of consequential loss. It is possible for a loss of profits or loss of opportunity to be a direct loss, although the great case of Hadley v Baxendale illustrates that is by no means the ordinary run of things.

See also