Manifest error: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}“[[manifest error]]” was in {{casenote|IIG Capital llc|Van der Merwe}}<ref>[2007] EWHC 435 para 52</ref> as one which is “obvious or easily demonstrable without extensive investigation” even if not readily apparent at the time that the certificate was provided.  
{{a|boilerplate|}}“[[manifest error]]” was in {{casenote|IIG Capital llc|Van der Merwe}}<ref>[2007] EWHC 435 para 52</ref> as one which is “obvious or easily demonstrable without extensive investigation” even if not readily apparent at the time that the certificate was provided.  


In {{casenote|North Shore Ventures Ltd|Anstead Holdings Inc}} the court said:
In {{casenote|North Shore Ventures Ltd|Anstead Holdings Inc}} the court said:

Revision as of 16:35, 13 July 2020

Boilerplate Anatomy™


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

“manifest error” was in IIG Capital llc v Van der Merwe[1] as one which is “obvious or easily demonstrable without extensive investigation” even if not readily apparent at the time that the certificate was provided.

In North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings Inc the court said:

“it is quite possible for one person to certify the existence of some fact at a particular moment in time which the other person, the recipient of the certificate, cannot verify save after the occurrence of a subsequent event”.

See also

References

  1. ↑ [2007] EWHC 435 para 52
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Manifest_error&oldid=45920"