MiFID v EMIR

The JC’s Reg and Leg resource™ Go Premium Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Regulation Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Regulation Legislation Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you. Sign up for our newsletter.

The two major pieces of regulation covering the European investment banking and trading worlds are MiFID — the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and EMIR — the European Market Infrastructure Regulation.

As a super high level, what is the difference between MiFID and EMIR?

Comparison between EMIR and MiFID

Aspect	EMIR	MiFID
Regulation Type	Regulation (implemented directly into EU law)	Directive (implemented through national legislation)
Objective	Mitigating systemic risk in OTC derivatives markets. Therefore this focuses on investment activity, whoever is doing it.	Harmonising EU financial markets regulation. Therefore this focuses on investment firms who are offering services to the public.
Regulator	European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)	National Competent Authorities (NCAs)
Scope	Regulates how participants transact in OTC derivatives markets, in particular: Clearing: When they have to clear transactions across a central counterparty. Margin: When they have to post regulatory variation and initial margin. Reporting: What they have to report about their trades to trade repositories	Regulates how financial services businesses provide investment services and activities to customers Regulated activities: The Investment services and activities set out in Annex I section A of MiFID. Client categorisation: The “professional”, “elective professional” and other (generally regarded as “retail”) client categories set out in Annex II of MiFID. Best Execution: The best execution obligations set out in Article 27. Transaction reporting: Don’t ask me why, but transaction reporting to National competent authorities is handled by MiFID.