Microsoft Word: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


Refuseniks may prefer [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] (if trained in [[middle management]]) or even [[Microsoft Excel]] (if accountancy) as a canvass for composing documents. But the days of purpose-built alternative word-processing software packages, like Lotus Notes or WordPerfect or even the admirable but, preternaturally doomed open-source application OpenOffice are long gone. Google Docs might survive, but only because it purports to fill a very different need. And, ''Google''.
Refuseniks may prefer [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] (if trained in [[middle management]]) or even [[Microsoft Excel]] (if accountancy) as a canvass for composing documents. But the days of purpose-built alternative word-processing software packages, like Lotus Notes or WordPerfect or even the admirable but, preternaturally doomed open-source application OpenOffice are long gone. Google Docs might survive, but only because it purports to fill a very different need. And, ''Google''.
[[Legaltechbros]] have a baffling conviction that their prospective clients are not so utterly fused to Microsoft Word that they will be prepared to use some browser-based html editor to compile automated documents ''instead'' of Word. This is baffling but may reflect the fact, as noted below, most [[legaltechbro]] are lapsed lawyers, lapsed lawyers are generally not good ones, and mediocre lawyers as a class are fundamentally ignorant of how powerful Microsoft Word is, as discussed below.


===Formatting===
===Formatting===

Revision as of 07:47, 28 November 2022

The JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.


Tippex on screen.jpg
Getting rid of those carriage returns one stroke at a time


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

“Track changes is the thief of joy.”[1]

—Theodore Roosevelt

Microsoft Word
/ˈmaɪkrəsɒft wɜːd/ (n.)

Word processing software that never quite managed to sort out auto-paragraph numbering but nonetheless sweeps all other office word-processing software before it.

Refuseniks may prefer Microsoft PowerPoint (if trained in middle management) or even Microsoft Excel (if accountancy) as a canvass for composing documents. But the days of purpose-built alternative word-processing software packages, like Lotus Notes or WordPerfect or even the admirable but, preternaturally doomed open-source application OpenOffice are long gone. Google Docs might survive, but only because it purports to fill a very different need. And, Google.

Legaltechbros have a baffling conviction that their prospective clients are not so utterly fused to Microsoft Word that they will be prepared to use some browser-based html editor to compile automated documents instead of Word. This is baffling but may reflect the fact, as noted below, most legaltechbro are lapsed lawyers, lapsed lawyers are generally not good ones, and mediocre lawyers as a class are fundamentally ignorant of how powerful Microsoft Word is, as discussed below.

Formatting

Despite Word’s universality and longevity and their supposedly superior analytical powers, few legal eagles have the first clue how the devil Microsoft Word formatting works. They see the printed output of a document that looked all right to them on screen as some kind of ineffable magic — if it works — or the spurious ministrations of the capricious imp that inhabits their typewriter keyboard, when (as is inevitable) it does not.

It goes without saying that the more nuanced skills — multi-level list numbering, consistently applying pre-defined paragraph and character styles and effectively manipulating tables — are beyond all but the most space-aged of legal brains.

But most legal eagles struggle with the idea of a page break or a tab stop, and instead lean on the space bar or return key letting it coast out randomly into the middle of the page, or down until it runs off the bottom and only a new page.

Lawyers usually are quite good at using track changes, however. Lawyers love track changes. They wish you could do track changes on emails and text messages, and will take some pains to replicate track changes by formatting in red strikethrough and blue underlining.

See also

References

  1. He may have said “comparison” but this is what he meant.