Microsoft Word: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Refuseniks may prefer [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] (if trained in [[middle management]]) or even [[Microsoft Excel]] (if accountancy) as a canvass for composing documents. But the days of purpose-built alternative word-processing software packages, like [[Lotus Notes]] or [[WordPerfect]] or even the admirable but, preternaturally doomed open source application [[OpenOffice]] are long gone. [[Google Docs]] might survive, but only because it purports to fill a very different need. | Refuseniks may prefer [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] (if trained in [[middle management]]) or even [[Microsoft Excel]] (if accountancy) as a canvass for composing documents. But the days of purpose-built alternative word-processing software packages, like [[Lotus Notes]] or [[WordPerfect]] or even the admirable but, preternaturally doomed open source application [[OpenOffice]] are long gone. [[Google Docs]] might survive, but only because it purports to fill a very different need. | ||
{{Microsoft office}} | {{Microsoft office}} | ||
{{c|Microsoft Office}} | {{c|Microsoft Office}} | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 9 January 2019
Word processing software that never quite managed to sort out auto-paragraph numbering but nonetheless sweeps all other office wordprocessing software before it.
Refuseniks may prefer Microsoft PowerPoint (if trained in middle management) or even Microsoft Excel (if accountancy) as a canvass for composing documents. But the days of purpose-built alternative word-processing software packages, like Lotus Notes or WordPerfect or even the admirable but, preternaturally doomed open source application OpenOffice are long gone. Google Docs might survive, but only because it purports to fill a very different need.
See also
- The lost tribes of Microsoft Office