Natural language processing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|tech|}}One of the Holy Grails of reg tech is natural language processing: some varieties of the same thing: a machine that reads contracts for you. this could come...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|tech|}}One of the [[Holy Grails of reg tech]] is [[natural language processing]]: some varieties of the same thing: a machine that reads contracts for you. this could come in the following articulations: | {{a|tech|}}One of the [[Holy Grails of reg tech]] is [[natural language processing]]: some varieties of the same thing: a machine that reads contracts for you. this could come in the following articulations: | ||
*'''Data extraction''': Crawling over your portfolio of 40,000 {{isdama}}s<ref>You know, the ones printed on faded waxy fax paper and languishing in filing cabinets around the trading floor; the ones scanned into a 57 MB tiff file along with three amendments, forty pages of specimen signatures, a power of attorney, hand-annotated emails from Credit and the five key pages of the Schedule missing; the ones that are misfiled as Swiss [[ | *'''Data extraction''': Crawling over your portfolio of 40,000 {{isdama}}s<ref>You know, the ones printed on faded waxy fax paper and languishing in filing cabinets around the trading floor; the ones scanned into a 57 MB tiff file along with three amendments, forty pages of specimen signatures, a power of attorney, hand-annotated emails from Credit and the five key pages of the Schedule missing; the ones that are misfiled as Swiss [[rahmenrvertrag]]s; the ones that are just not there at all.</ref> to extract the 60 key [[trading]] and [[credit]] terms out of them that the firm neglected to collect over the last 25 years while it was signing them up; | ||
*'''[[Legal agreement review]]''': algorithmically scanning standard-form {{t|contracts}}<ref>To date, only one any one has successfully managed is the one that no-one really cares about: the [[confidentiality agreement]] to identify key terms and risk provisions and save human lawyers from that tedious chore; | *'''[[Legal agreement review]]''': algorithmically scanning standard-form {{t|contracts}}<ref>To date, only one any one has successfully managed is the one that no-one really cares about: the [[confidentiality agreement]]</ref> to identify key terms and risk provisions and save human lawyers from that tedious chore; | ||
*'''[[Chat bots]]''': An online, chat buddy to whom [[Sales]] can basic legal questions, thereby saving [[Sales]] the aggravation of having to talk to the [[legal eagles]], and [[legal]] the utter [[tedium]] of having to answer the exact same question to the exact [[Sales]] person three or four times daily. | *'''[[Chat bots]]''': An online, chat buddy to whom [[Sales]] can basic legal questions, thereby saving [[Sales]] the aggravation of having to talk to the [[legal eagles]], and [[legal]] the utter [[tedium]] of having to answer the exact same question to the exact [[Sales]] person three or four times daily. | ||
Revision as of 14:40, 8 July 2019
|
The JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
|
One of the Holy Grails of reg tech is natural language processing: some varieties of the same thing: a machine that reads contracts for you. this could come in the following articulations:
- Data extraction: Crawling over your portfolio of 40,000 ISDA Master Agreements[1] to extract the 60 key trading and credit terms out of them that the firm neglected to collect over the last 25 years while it was signing them up;
- Legal agreement review: algorithmically scanning standard-form contracts[2] to identify key terms and risk provisions and save human lawyers from that tedious chore;
- Chat bots: An online, chat buddy to whom Sales can basic legal questions, thereby saving Sales the aggravation of having to talk to the legal eagles, and legal the utter tedium of having to answer the exact same question to the exact Sales person three or four times daily.
- ↑ You know, the ones printed on faded waxy fax paper and languishing in filing cabinets around the trading floor; the ones scanned into a 57 MB tiff file along with three amendments, forty pages of specimen signatures, a power of attorney, hand-annotated emails from Credit and the five key pages of the Schedule missing; the ones that are misfiled as Swiss rahmenrvertrags; the ones that are just not there at all.
- ↑ To date, only one any one has successfully managed is the one that no-one really cares about: the confidentiality agreement