Negative-calorie foods: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A food lower in calorific content that the energy required to eat it. Eating negative calorie foods, so the theory goes, in itself leads to weight loss. The most widely cited...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A food lower in calorific content that the energy required to eat it. Eating negative calorie foods, so the theory goes, in itself leads to weight loss. | A food lower in calorific content that the energy required to eat it. Eating negative calorie foods, so the theory goes, in itself leads to weight loss. | ||
The most widely cited negative food is [[celery]]. | The most widely cited negative food is [[celery]]. But [[celery]] ''isn't'' a [[negative-calorie food]]<ref>http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1896439_1896359_1896346,00.html</ref>, especially when you load it with cream cheese, which is the only sensible way to eat it. [[Celery]] is pointless, tasteless and just gets in the way. No-one enjoys it. Rather like [[legal celery]]. | ||
{{Seealso}} | {{Seealso}} | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{egg}} | {{egg}} | ||
{{draft}} | {{draft}} | ||
{{ref}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:32, 11 June 2018
A food lower in calorific content that the energy required to eat it. Eating negative calorie foods, so the theory goes, in itself leads to weight loss.
The most widely cited negative food is celery. But celery isn't a negative-calorie food[1], especially when you load it with cream cheese, which is the only sensible way to eat it. Celery is pointless, tasteless and just gets in the way. No-one enjoys it. Rather like legal celery.