Negotiable instrument: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
*[[Rome II]] which excludes from its ambit [[non-contractual dispute]]s arising out of the negotiable nature of [[negotiable instrument|negotiable instruments]].
*[[Rome II]] which excludes from its ambit [[non-contractual dispute]]s arising out of the negotiable nature of [[negotiable instrument|negotiable instruments]].
*[[Bitcoin]]
*[[Bitcoin]]
{{ref}}

Revision as of 09:01, 28 September 2021

The Jolly Contrarian’s Dictionary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Dictionary.jpg

Index — Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Negotiable instrument (n.)
An instrument conferring a right to a payment of money or the delivery assets which the bearer can, without the issuer’s consent, transfer to a third party (a process known as, confusingly, as “negotiating”).

These days, negotiable instruments are more or less the same as transferable securities, but in the good old days banker’s drafts, cheques, bills of exchange, promissory notes and — well, large ruminant herbivores[1] — which did not count as securities but were nonetheless negotiable.

The new generation of crypto-currencies (you know, like bitcoin) may just usher in a new golden era for negotiable instruments. We’ll see.

See also

References

  1. Mansuetae naturae, needless to say.