Negotiate: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{def|Negotiate|/nɪˈɡəʊʃɪeɪt/|v|File:Negotiable cow.jpg}} 1. (''Archaic'') of a negotiable instrument, such as a cow, to transfer ones rights, t...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{def|Negotiate|/nɪˈɡəʊʃɪeɪt/|v|File:Negotiable cow.jpg}} | {{def|Negotiate|/nɪˈɡəʊʃɪeɪt/|v| | ||
1. (''Archaic'') of a [[negotiable instrument]], such as a [[Albert Haddock|cow]], to | [[File:Negotiable cow.jpg|450px|thumb|center|A [[Negotiable instrument]], yesterday.]] | ||
2. Of an industry-standard master trading agreement, to spend six months communicating to your proposed counterparty your credit | }}1. (''Archaic'') of a [[negotiable instrument]], such as a [[Albert Haddock|cow]], to [[assign]] one’s rights, title and interests in it to a third person by “endorsing” it.<br> | ||
2. Of an industry-standard [[master trading agreement]], to spend six months communicating to your proposed counterparty your [[credit department]]’s view — which they cannot bring themselves to express to your counterparty in person, it being a matter of “legal [[verbiage]]” that they, mere men and women of finance and not law are not qualified to “opine” — that your firm will [[I'm not going to die in a ditch about it|die in a ditch]] before accepting [[cross-acceleration]] or some similar concession the firm would in fact never in a million years use, and would not understand how to even if they wanted to. | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Negotiator]] | *[[Negotiator]] | ||
*[[Negotiable cow]] | *[[Negotiable cow]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:51, 12 December 2020
 A Negotiable instrument, yesterday.
|
Negotiate /nɪˈɡəʊʃɪeɪt/ (v.)
1. (Archaic) of a negotiable instrument, such as a cow, to assign one’s rights, title and interests in it to a third person by “endorsing” it.
2. Of an industry-standard master trading agreement, to spend six months communicating to your proposed counterparty your credit department’s view — which they cannot bring themselves to express to your counterparty in person, it being a matter of “legal verbiage” that they, mere men and women of finance and not law are not qualified to “opine” — that your firm will die in a ditch before accepting cross-acceleration or some similar concession the firm would in fact never in a million years use, and would not understand how to even if they wanted to.