No oral amendment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "“No oral modification”. A stricture on an amendment agreement. No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirel...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
“[[No oral modification]]”. A stricture on an [[amendment agreement]]. | “'''[[No oral modification]]'''”. A self-contradictory stricture on an [[amendment agreement]], until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers. | ||
No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirely vacuous piece of legal reasoning. | No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirely vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in {{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}. | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[[Amendment]] | *[[Amendment]] | ||
*{{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}} | *{{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}} | ||
Revision as of 13:01, 18 May 2018
“No oral modification”. A self-contradictory stricture on an amendment agreement, until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers.
No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirely vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited.