Non-defaulting Party - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdasnap|Non-defaulting Party}}
{{fullanat2|AGMT|Non-defaulting Party|2002|Non-defaulting Party|1992}}
====Commentary====
{{comm}}
To be compared with - well, {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}. Of all things. And {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}}, as well. The difference between a {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}} and a {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}}, and the linguistic torture that distinction as inflicted on the race of ISDA lawyers ever since, says everything you need to know about the absurdity of modern commercial law.
To be compared with - well, {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}. Of all things. And {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}}, as well. The difference between a {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}} and a {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}}, and the linguistic torture that distinction as inflicted on the race of ISDA lawyers ever since, says everything you need to know about the absurdity of modern commercial law.
 
{{seealso}}
====See Also====
*{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}
*{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}
{{isdaanatomy}}
{{isdaanatomy}}

Revision as of 10:38, 13 March 2017


Template:AGMTquote
Template:AGMTquote


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.


Commentary

To be compared with - well, Defaulting Party. Of all things. And Non-affected Party, as well. The difference between a Non-defaulting Party and a Non-affected Party, and the linguistic torture that distinction as inflicted on the race of ISDA lawyers ever since, says everything you need to know about the absurdity of modern commercial law.

See also

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Non-defaulting_Party_-_ISDA_Provision&oldid=15999"