Non-defaulting Party - ISDA Provision

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 10:38, 13 March 2017 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In gory detail

1992 ISDA
Non-defaulting Party” has the meaning specified in Section 6(a).

(view template)

2002 ISDA
Non-defaulting Party” has the meaning specified in Section 6(a).

(view template)

Commentary

To be compared with - well, Defaulting Party. Of all things. And Non-affected Party, as well. The difference between a Non-defaulting Party and a Non-affected Party, and the linguistic torture that distinction as inflicted on the race of ISDA lawyers ever since, says everything you need to know about the absurdity of modern commercial law.

See Also