Performative: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
}}{{d|Performative|/pəˈfɔːmətɪv/|adj}} | }}{{d|Performative|/pəˈfɔːmətɪv/|adj}} | ||
1. (''[[Critical theory]]'') Characterised by the performance of a social or cultural role: ''the contextual and performative aspects of [[gender]]''. | 1. (''[[Critical theory]]'') Characterised by the performance of a social or cultural role: ''the contextual and performative aspects of [[gender]]''. This is the intellectual origin of Judith Butler’s insistence that gender is a mutable social construct, characterised by repeated actions, language and dispositions that shape (and are shaped by) the physical environment. The repetitions are not always conscious, and are not necessarily voluntary or a product of free choice. If gender is “performative” in this way — and this does seem to be a distance from what one traditionally meant by “sex” — then it stands to reason that where one can make a free choice about ones performances, then one’s gender is whatever one chooses it to be. The JC will deftly duck out of further extrapolations of what this might mean in practice, since they run fairly quickly into fear, loathing and petulance. But it is an interesting intellectual concept. | ||
2. (''Media relations'') Describing an action that resembling a dramatic or artistic ''performance'', being one in whose acquiescence one must suspend disbelief | 2. (''Media relations'') Describing an action that resembling a dramatic or artistic ''performance'', being one in whose acquiescence one must suspend disbelief willingly — if on a stage of some kind — or gullibly, if in a political or commercial context. A magician’s misdirection. The key to this kind of performativity is the tacit understanding that one is not expected to personally subscribe to what one is saying. Just as we do not expect Anthony Hopkins to really like human liver with fava beans and chianti, nor do we expect the [[ultra-high net worth wealth management]] executive who pledges to leave no stone unturned to reduce global income inequality to suddenly stop cooking up elaborate tax shelters to increase his client’s already monstrous slice of that global pie. “It’s a crucial moment in history,” said [[Abraaj]] founder, [[Arif Naqvi]]. “It’s an opportunity to immutably and absolutely change the course of innumerable lives.” | ||
3. '' | 3. (''Technical, and not really in use these days'') Relating to an utterance by means of which the speaker performs a particular act (e.g. “I guarantee”, I “represent”, I “[[promise]]” ). | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Virtue-signalling]] | *[[Virtue-signalling]] | ||
Revision as of 14:49, 2 October 2021
|
Office anthropology™
|
Performative
/pəˈfɔːmətɪv/ (adj.)
1. (Critical theory) Characterised by the performance of a social or cultural role: the contextual and performative aspects of gender. This is the intellectual origin of Judith Butler’s insistence that gender is a mutable social construct, characterised by repeated actions, language and dispositions that shape (and are shaped by) the physical environment. The repetitions are not always conscious, and are not necessarily voluntary or a product of free choice. If gender is “performative” in this way — and this does seem to be a distance from what one traditionally meant by “sex” — then it stands to reason that where one can make a free choice about ones performances, then one’s gender is whatever one chooses it to be. The JC will deftly duck out of further extrapolations of what this might mean in practice, since they run fairly quickly into fear, loathing and petulance. But it is an interesting intellectual concept.
2. (Media relations) Describing an action that resembling a dramatic or artistic performance, being one in whose acquiescence one must suspend disbelief willingly — if on a stage of some kind — or gullibly, if in a political or commercial context. A magician’s misdirection. The key to this kind of performativity is the tacit understanding that one is not expected to personally subscribe to what one is saying. Just as we do not expect Anthony Hopkins to really like human liver with fava beans and chianti, nor do we expect the ultra-high net worth wealth management executive who pledges to leave no stone unturned to reduce global income inequality to suddenly stop cooking up elaborate tax shelters to increase his client’s already monstrous slice of that global pie. “It’s a crucial moment in history,” said Abraaj founder, Arif Naqvi. “It’s an opportunity to immutably and absolutely change the course of innumerable lives.”
3. (Technical, and not really in use these days) Relating to an utterance by means of which the speaker performs a particular act (e.g. “I guarantee”, I “represent”, I “promise” ).