Privilege: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[Privileged and confidential attorney work product|***PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT***]] | [[Privileged and confidential attorney work product|***PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT***]] | ||
{{seealso}} | |||
*{{casenote1|RBS Rights Issue Litigation}} | |||
*{{casenote1|Three Rivers No. 5}} | |||
{{casenote|SFO|ENRC}} | |||
Revision as of 11:33, 22 January 2018
***PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT***
On the subject of legal professional privilege attaching to communications to or from your internal legal team:
There is none, now that Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation is a thing.
***PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT***