Quasi-agency: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "an american attempt to reconcile their pie-eyed notions of agency with the grim economic realities of equities brokerage. A riskless principal, they say, is a quasi-...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
an american attempt to reconcile their pie-eyed notions of [[agency]] with the grim economic realities of equities brokerage. A [[riskless principal]], they say, is a [[quasi-agent]]<ref>IT ISN’T.</ref>. | an american attempt to reconcile their pie-eyed notions of [[agency]] with the grim economic realities of equities brokerage. A [[riskless principal]], they say, is a [[quasi-agent]]<ref>IT ISN’T.</ref>. | ||
Just while I’ve got you hear let’s rehearse the scenarios of ''actual'' agency. | |||
{{agencydisclosurescenarios}} | {{agencydisclosurescenarios}} | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[[Investment Advisers Act of 1940]] | *[[Investment Advisers Act of 1940]] | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Revision as of 16:38, 2 May 2018
an american attempt to reconcile their pie-eyed notions of agency with the grim economic realities of equities brokerage. A riskless principal, they say, is a quasi-agent[1].
Just while I’ve got you hear let’s rehearse the scenarios of actual agency.
Possible agency scenarios
Here are the possible “undisclosed agency” scenarios at the time of contract:
- Fully disclosed agency: Principal has appointed agent, agent has disclosed agency, agent has disclosed principal.
- Undisclosed principal: Principal has appointed agent, agent has disclosed agency, agent has not disclosed principal.
- Undisclosed agency: Principal has appointed agent, agent has not disclosed agency, agent has not disclosed principal.
- Full principal: Principal has not appointed agent, agent has not disclosed agency, agent has not disclosed principal. (i.e., a fellow who claims ex post facto to have been an agent is better known as a “liar”).
See also
References
- ↑ IT ISN’T.