Recital: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
Thus, having been primed with this tantalising backdrop, expect to spend your next half-hour hacking through a dense undergrowth of [[Definitions|definition]]s, matters of [[interpretation]], [[construction]], [[hierarchy of documents]] and superfluous extemporisations on [[Singular|singulars]], [[Plural|plurals]], masculine, feminine and neuter, and the socio-economic power structures implicit in gendered legal language<ref>Ok: not really that likely yet, but we ''are'' heading that way.</ref> before you get there, by which time you will be tired, hungry, scratched, possibly injured, desperately needing a pee and really wanting to go home.
Thus, having been primed with this tantalising backdrop, expect to spend your next half-hour hacking through a dense undergrowth of [[Definitions|definition]]s, matters of [[interpretation]], [[construction]], [[hierarchy of documents]] and superfluous extemporisations on [[Singular|singulars]], [[Plural|plurals]], masculine, feminine and neuter, and the socio-economic power structures implicit in gendered legal language<ref>Ok: not really that likely yet, but we ''are'' heading that way.</ref> before you get there, by which time you will be tired, hungry, scratched, possibly injured, desperately needing a pee and really wanting to go home.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*{{br|Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race Gender and Identity}}
*[[Definitions]]
*[[Interpretation]]
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Revision as of 11:54, 5 January 2021

Boilerplate Anatomy™
I want to tell you a story

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

A legal eagle’s nugatory attempt at design.

WHEREAS:

The legal eagle’s opportunity to tell a bit of a story, using the juridical version of “once upon a time”: basically, an integrated passage (that, if it doesn’t start with “once upon a time” or “whereas” or “background” is sometimes called a “preamble”) which leads you into the meat of contract — or in a perfect world, would do, but the juridical magisterium being what it is — an imperfect fiefdom designed for the pleasure of pedants — it will lead you instead into a thicket of tedious preliminaries.

Thus, having been primed with this tantalising backdrop, expect to spend your next half-hour hacking through a dense undergrowth of definitions, matters of interpretation, construction, hierarchy of documents and superfluous extemporisations on singulars, plurals, masculine, feminine and neuter, and the socio-economic power structures implicit in gendered legal language[1] before you get there, by which time you will be tired, hungry, scratched, possibly injured, desperately needing a pee and really wanting to go home.

See also

References

  1. Ok: not really that likely yet, but we are heading that way.