Red Flag Act: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}
* If your interest runs to traction engines, see the [[Locomotive Act]]
* If your interest runs to traction engines, see the [[Locomotive Act]]
* If {{t|netting}} is your thing, you might be interested in the [[Bank for International Settlements]]’ [[BIS netting recommendations|monograph]] on the [[Close-out netting|subject]] from 1989 which, [[Amwell J|this writer]] humbly submits, still operates like a man walking with a red flag in front of the three trillion dollar global derivatives industry.
* If {{t|netting}} is your thing, you might be interested in the [[Bank for International Settlements]]’ [[BIS netting recommendations|monograph]] on the [[Close-out netting|subject]] from 1989 which, [[Amwell J|this writer]] humbly submits, still operates like a man walking with a red flag in front of the three trillion dollar global derivatives industry.
Basel close-out netting requirements: systematically preferring the free allocation of capital among Western countries over developing countries. There are 27/27 netting jurisdictions in the European Union,  18/20 of the G20, but just 2/54 in Africa, on of which is in the G20 (South Africa) and the other of which is an Island (Mauritius).
Discuss.

Revision as of 11:36, 9 June 2020

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.


Basel close-out netting requirements: systematically preferring the free allocation of capital among Western countries over developing countries. There are 27/27 netting jurisdictions in the European Union, 18/20 of the G20, but just 2/54 in Africa, on of which is in the G20 (South Africa) and the other of which is an Island (Mauritius).

Discuss.