Relevant: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Now this seems like a fine thing to say, until you put the contrary case: is can you imagine a court finding in favour of a counterparty claiming to labour under the misapprehension that he meant to talk about an Issuer of ''[[irrelevant]]'' {{eqderivprov|Shares}}? | Now this seems like a fine thing to say, until you put the contrary case: is can you imagine a court finding in favour of a counterparty claiming to labour under the misapprehension that he meant to talk about an Issuer of ''[[irrelevant]]'' {{eqderivprov|Shares}}? | ||
This author says “no”. Fun fact: “[[relevant]]” appears 272 times in the {{eqdefs}}, and | This author says “no”. Fun fact: “[[relevant]]” appears 272 times in the {{eqdefs}}, 119 times in the {{ietama}}, 89 times in the {{emissionsannex}} and only 84 times in the {{isdama}}. | ||
===The stock [[Young Ones]] reference=== | ===The stock [[Young Ones]] reference=== | ||