Res verbositans: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|confcall|}}The fundamental [[Ontology|ontological]] character of the participant in a [[all-hands conference call]], as distinct from that person’s corporeal body, their personality, their outside interests (in football, knitting, sailing, ornithology, or any other damn thing on the planet but this benighted [[conference call]] etc). This came from [[Otto Büchstein]] on his ''[[Discourse on | {{a|confcall|}}The fundamental [[Ontology|ontological]] character of the participant in a [[all-hands conference call]], as distinct from that person’s corporeal body, their personality, their outside interests (in football, knitting, sailing, ornithology, or any other damn thing on the planet but this benighted [[conference call]] etc). This came from [[Otto Büchstein]] on his ''[[Discourse on Intercourse]]'', whose aphorism ''[[convenimus ergo es]]'' sharply criticised [[Descartes]] more famous formulation, “[[cogito ergo sum]]”. | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} |
Revision as of 16:06, 2 April 2019
Conference Call Anatomy™
|
The fundamental ontological character of the participant in a all-hands conference call, as distinct from that person’s corporeal body, their personality, their outside interests (in football, knitting, sailing, ornithology, or any other damn thing on the planet but this benighted conference call etc). This came from Otto Büchstein on his Discourse on Intercourse, whose aphorism convenimus ergo es sharply criticised Descartes more famous formulation, “cogito ergo sum”.