Security interest: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
:''It is sometimes said that there are only four types of consensual security right known to the law, namely pledge, lien, mortgage and charge.'' — Briggs J in {{casenote1|Re Lehman Brothers International}} <br>
:''It is sometimes said that there are only four types of consensual [[Security interest|security right]] known to the law, namely [[pledge]], [[lien]], [[mortgage]] and [[charge]].'' — Briggs J in {{casenote1|Re Lehman Brothers International}} <br>


{{tag|Security}} can take many forms, depending on your legal system.  We here are principally concerned with the common law. That is, the proper one. The overweening piece of statute here is the [[Law of Property Act 1925]].
{{tag|Security}} can take many forms, depending on your legal system.  We here are principally concerned with the common law. That is, the proper one. The overweening piece of statute here is the [[Law of Property Act 1925]].

Revision as of 17:45, 18 January 2018

It is sometimes said that there are only four types of consensual security right known to the law, namely pledge, lien, mortgage and charge. — Briggs J in Re Lehman Brothers International

Security can take many forms, depending on your legal system. We here are principally concerned with the common law. That is, the proper one. The overweening piece of statute here is the Law of Property Act 1925.

Types of security interest

There are:

Legal security interests can (and often do) revert to equitable security interests if they fail for formal or procedural reasons.

Types of legal security interest

Collateral: A Trick for young players

Collateral” can be represented by, but is not the same as, a Template:Security interest.

A title transfer collateral arrangement where one party delivers collateral to another as credit support in the hopeful expectation that, at a later time, it will get an equivalent thing back[1], is not a legal security interest. It isn't a security interest at all, in fact. This is good, because there is none of this tedious mucking around with equity, formalities, registration and the fear and loathing of transactional lawyers that accompanies them. The worst that can do is issue veiled threats about the risk of recharacterisation, but this is poor form and really rather passive aggressive behaviour, in this correspondent’s opinion.

Template:See also

  1. Such as is witnessed under a 1994 NY CSA or a 2010 GMSLA for example.