Shubtill v Port Authority of Finchley

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 14:18, 7 November 2016 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The plaintiff had sought approval from the defendant, a local authority, for a punting business in the Hampstead Garden Suburb. The defendant claimed it declined in a conversa...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The plaintiff had sought approval from the defendant, a local authority, for a punting business in the Hampstead Garden Suburb. The defendant claimed it declined in a conversation with the plaintiff, as it was entitled to do in accordance with the governing regulations. The regulation required notification of the consideration to be delivered orally or in writing.

The defendant claimed that it had indicated its decision, which was no, in the course of that conversation. Mr Dickson of the defendant shook his head.