|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| It will be a rum {{tag|GMSLA}} indeed in which this provision applies. It will generally fall upon deaf ears, by dint of paragraph {{gmslaprov|5.4}} ({{gmslaprov|aggregate margining}}), which will apply instead unless you specifically override it, and it is hard to conceive of situations in which you would do that.
| | {{manual|MSG|2010|5.5|Section|5.5|short}} |
| | |
| Anyway, since you asked, it goes like this:
| |
| {{nuts|GMSLA|5.5}}
| |
| | |
| Or, in all its glory:
| |
| {{gmslasnap|5.5}}
| |
| | |
| ====Commentary====
| |
| See also {{gmslaprov|5.4}}, Collateralisation on aggregate, which will generally (for which read “inevitably”) be the preferred alternative for most financial institutions.
| |
| | |
| ====See Also====
| |
| | |
| {{gmslaanatomy}}
| |