83,484
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The plaintiff [[Ernest Shubtill]] had sought approval from the defendant | The plaintiff [[Ernest Shubtill]] had sought approval from the defendant local authority to operate a punt within the Hampstead Garden Suburb. Authority was declined. The defendant claimed it did this, [[pursuant to]] regulation, during a face-to-face meeting with the plaintiff, as it was entitled to do in accordance with the governing regulations. The regulation required notification of the consideration to be delivered [[orally or in writing]]. | ||
{{box|Any person affected by a direction issued under this subchapter may request reconsideration by the official who issued it or in whose name it was issued. This request may be made [[orally or in writing]], and the decision of the official receiving the request may be rendered [[orally or in writing]]. | {{box|Any person affected by a direction issued under this subchapter may request reconsideration by the official who issued it or in whose name it was issued. This request may be made [[orally or in writing]], and the decision of the official receiving the request may be rendered [[orally or in writing]] within seven days of the request. | ||
:::''Finchley Municipal Regulations (Port and Waterways Authorities)'' }} | :::''Finchley Municipal Regulations (Port and Waterways Authorities)'' }} | ||
The defendant claimed that it had indicated its decision, which was no, in the course of that conversation. Mr Dickson of the defendant shook his head. | The defendant claimed that it had indicated its decision, which was no, in the course of that conversation. Mr Dickson of the defendant shook his head. |