Commission: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Commission is only relevant to an [[agency]] contract.  
Commission is only relevant to an [[agency]] contract. Where a [[broker]] acts as [[riskless principal]] (or any other kind of [[principal]]) there is NO [[commission]]: the payment we ''call'' a “[[commission]]” is really just an additional [[fee]].
 
Where a broker acts as [[riskless principal]] (or any other kind of [[principal]]) there is NO commission: the payment we ''call'' a “[[commission]]” is really just an additional [[fee]].


===Rationale===  
===Rationale===  
Line 12: Line 10:
'''Example''': A real estate [[agent]] arranges a transaction between vendor and purchaser. It is not in the [[contractual chain]] itself. Therefore one pays the purchase price to the [[vendor]], but the [[commission]] to the [[agent]] - look upon it as a [[derivative]] of the purchase price, if the fancy takes you — though honestly even I think that is to stretch the {{tag|metaphor}} a little.
'''Example''': A real estate [[agent]] arranges a transaction between vendor and purchaser. It is not in the [[contractual chain]] itself. Therefore one pays the purchase price to the [[vendor]], but the [[commission]] to the [[agent]] - look upon it as a [[derivative]] of the purchase price, if the fancy takes you — though honestly even I think that is to stretch the {{tag|metaphor}} a little.
}}
}}
====Swaps====
===[[Delta-one]] [[Swap|swaps]]===
Now: if you have [[legal]], [[regulatory]] or — gasp — [[tax]] reasons for not wanting to have anything to do with the [[principal]] contract between — say your [[swap counterparty]] and its [[hedge]], you are best advised to call the [[consideration]] you pay your [[swap counterparty]] for agreeing to pass the economics of its [[hedge]] to you a “[[fee]]”, because the counterparty is your counterparty in the contractual chain, and not a “[[commission]]”, which might be taken by mendacious minds in revenue departments to imply it was an [[agent]].
Now: if you have [[legal]], [[regulatory]] or — gasp — [[tax]] reasons for not wanting to have anything to do with the [[principal]] contract between — say your [[swap counterparty]] and its [[hedge]], you are best advised to call the [[consideration]] you pay your [[swap counterparty]] for agreeing to pass the economics of its [[hedge]] to you a “[[fee]]”, because the counterparty is your counterparty in the contractual chain, and not a “[[commission]]”, which might be taken by mendacious minds in revenue departments to imply it was an [[agent]].


Navigation menu