83,493
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This is a [[correlation]], though, not [[causation]], and it won’t flow the other way. Just because you put the kettle on at 4:30 doesn't mean you were watching the football, however likely it might seem. Probability is an is, not an ought. | This is a [[correlation]], though, not [[causation]], and it won’t flow the other way. Just because you put the kettle on at 4:30 doesn't mean you were watching the football, however likely it might seem. Probability is an is, not an ought. | ||
Hume: you cannot derive an “ought” from an “is”. The [[JC]]: you cannot derive an “is” from an “ought”. | |||
*[[doctrine of precedent]] | |||
*[[algorithms and heuristics]] | |||
*[[internal audit]] | |||
{{Seealso}} | {{Seealso}} | ||
*Closely related to the [[technology paradox]] | *Closely related to the [[technology paradox]] |