83,357
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
And what of this idea that one not only [[Representations and warranties|represents and warrants]] as of the moment one inks the paper, but also is [[deemed]] to ''repeat'' itself an the execution of each trade, on any day, or whenever a butterfly flaps its wings on [[Fitzcarraldo|Fitzcarraldo’s steamer]]<ref>Or whatever. WHATEVER DUDE.</ref>? Do we think it works? Do we? Given how | And what of this idea that one not only [[Representations and warranties|represents and warrants]] as of the moment one inks the paper, but also is [[deemed]] to ''repeat'' itself an the execution of each trade, on any day, or whenever a butterfly flaps its wings on [[Fitzcarraldo|Fitzcarraldo’s steamer]]<ref>Or whatever. WHATEVER DUDE.</ref>? Do we think it works? Do we? Given how<ref>WARNING: [[JC|CONTRARIAN]] VIEW COMING UP.</ref> practically '''useless''' even ''explicit'' [[representations]] are, ''does it really matter''? | ||
And, having given one, how are you supposed to ''stop'' a continuing {{tag|representation}} once it has marched off into the unknowable future, like one of those conjured brooms from the Sorcerer’s Apprentice? If you don’t stop it, what then? |