83,229
edits
AP Picture Houses v Wednesbury: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{cn}}{{wednesbury nutshell}} | |||
A famous exigesis on the meaning, in law, of the word “[[reasonable]]”. It seems quaint now, but the action concerned whether a local authority could be said to be acting reasonably in prohibiting children under the age 15 to attend cinemas on Sunday. | A famous exigesis on the meaning, in law, of the word “[[reasonable]]”. It seems quaint now, but the action concerned whether a local authority could be said to be acting reasonably in prohibiting children under the age 15 to attend cinemas on Sunday. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*{{casenote|Barclays|Unicredit}} | *{{casenote|Barclays|Unicredit}} | ||
*{{casenote|Crowther|Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd}} | *{{casenote|Crowther|Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd}} | ||