Template:Repo - FWMD: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fwmdtt|nickname= |title=[[ ]]|tagline=|documentation=  (SCORE)|booklets= . (SCORE)|customisability= . (SCORE)|asset classes= . (SCORE)|amendability= . (SCORE)|transferability= . (SCORE)|tenor= . (SCORE)|leverage= . (SCORE)|collateral= . (SCORE)|longevity= . (SCORE)|frightometer= . (SCORE)}}
{{fwmdtt|nickname=Repo|title=[[Global Master Repurchase Agreement]]|tagline=|documentation=Standard 2000 GMRA. Vague where it needs to be and not heavily negotiated. (5)|booklets=Nope. (1)|customisability=Well, you can have fun doing a [[stock loan]] under a [[repo]] master and vice versa if you must but otherwise, no, very standard. (3)|asset classes=Bonds, cash. Equities at a stretch. (3)|amendability=Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but would you, unless MiFID changed and you had to? (4)|transferability=Niente. Bilateral contract. You could Novate, but really why would you? (2)|tenor=Short - typically no more than a month. But at least it ''has'' a tenor. So better than a [[stock loan]].(3)|leverage=Fully collateralised, so nope. (1)|collateral= Yes. (6)|longevity=Repos have been around for ages and they'll be around for ages. (10)|frightometer=Sorry: not going to get hearts racing. (1)}}

Navigation menu