Singulars and plurals: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
To what end the forensic remark “All references to the singular [[shall]] include the [[plural]], and vice versa”?
To what end the forensic remark “All references to the singular [[shall]] include the [[plural]], and vice versa”?


To your correspondent, none. It is an whoreson zed; an unnecessary letter. This is throat-clearing text which, once in, benefits from the loving embrace of the [[anal paradox]], but serves no purpose beyond the [[Mediocre lawyer|mediocre attorney’s]] noble pursuit of prolixity. No lawyer will ever object to it, but — and ''because'' — it plays no role in unravelling the practical meaning of the legal {{t|contract}}, bar the obvious ones, where a singular does ''not'' include the plural — such as where a fellowis purchasing a single banger from a nasty café, and this language would be a nonsense.  
To your correspondent, none. It is a whoreson zed; an unnecessary letter. This is throat-clearing text which, once in, benefits from the loving embrace of the [[anal paradox]], but serves no purpose beyond the [[Mediocre lawyer|mediocre attorney’s]] noble pursuit of prolixity. No lawyer will ever object to it, but — and ''because'' — it plays no role in unravelling the practical meaning of the legal {{t|contract}}, bar the obvious ones, where a singular does ''not'' include the plural — where a fellow is acquiring a solitary sausage from a nasty café, for very good example — and it would be a nonsense.  


Can you imagine standing up in court and learnedly submitting that a [[plural]] did not include the [[singular]]?  Good news: just such an exchange features in the pages of the {{jclr}}! Let us turn to our go-to thought experiment: a testy exchange between {{jerrold}} and {{cocklecarrot}}, knee-deep, as they usually are, in bitter [[litigation]].
Can you imagine standing up in court and learnedly submitting that a [[plural]] did not include the [[singular]]?  Good news: just such an exchange features in the pages of the {{jclr}}! Let us turn to our go-to thought experiment: a testy exchange between {{jerrold}} and {{cocklecarrot}}, knee-deep, as they usually are, in bitter [[litigation]].
Line 25: Line 25:
:'''{{jbm}}''': If it pleases M’Lud.
:'''{{jbm}}''': If it pleases M’Lud.
''The Court adjourns. {{Jbm}} wipes his brow with a kerchief, and paramedics take Master Contrario away.''
''The Court adjourns. {{Jbm}} wipes his brow with a kerchief, and paramedics take Master Contrario away.''
{{sa}}
*[[Anal paradox]]

Navigation menu