Template:M summ GMRA 2000 6(j): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(Created page with "Clause {{gmraprov|6(j)}} is the {{gmra}}'s version of the {{isdama}}’s Section 2(a)(iii): it is a flawed asset provision, though in an agreement without any particular n...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Clause {{gmraprov|6(j)}} is the {{gmra}}'s version of the {{isdama}}’s Section 2(a)(iii): it is a [[flawed asset]] provision, though in an agreement without any particular need for one. Unlike the ISDA’s version, it's toggle-able, suggesting the framers of the {{gmra}} were somewhat embarrassed to include it. Rightly, because a [[flawed asset]] clause doesn’t make a colossal amount of sense in an intrinsically margined, callable transactions like a [[repo]] agreement.
Clause {{gmraprov|6(j)}} is the {{gmra}}'s version of the {{isdama}}’s Section 2(a)(iii): it is a [[flawed asset]] provision, though in an agreement without any particular need for one. Unlike the ISDA’s version, it's toggle-able, suggesting the framers of the {{gmra}} were somewhat embarrassed to include it. Rightly, because a [[flawed asset]] clause doesn’t make a colossal amount of sense in an intrinsically margined, callable transactions like a [[repo]] agreement.
Oddly, the {{gmsla}} doesn't have a [[flawed asset]] provision (the closest it gets is Paragraph {{gmslaprov|8.6}}), even though in most every other respect, it’s very similar to the {{gmra}}.

Navigation menu