|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Waiver]]: a place where the laws of the New World and the Old diverge. Does one really need a contractual provision dealing with the consequences of a fellow’s good-natured ''indulgence'' when carrying on commerce under an {{isdama}}? Those with an English qualification will snort, barking reference to {{casenote|Hughes|Metropolitan Railway}} and say this Section 9(f) is inconsequential fluff that goes without saying; those acquainted with the [[Uniform Commercial Code]] and the monstrous slabs of Manhattan will tread more carefully, lest they create a “[[course of dealing]]”.
| | {{isda 9(f) summ|isdaprov}} |
| | |
| Since the {{isdama}} was designed with ''either'' legal system in mind, {{icds}} came up with something that would work in either. to be sure it may offend stylists and minimalists like the [[JC]] who ply their trade in the old country, ''but it does no harm''.
| |
| | |
| {{Course of dealing vs waiver}}
| |