Legal mark-up: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


No such ornamentation is [[calculated]] to improve the elegance of the text, of course. To do that you will need to disentangle some convoluted grammar — perhaps by deleting an “[[as the case may be]]”.<ref> be careful not to ''add'' the same thing in one place and ''delete'' it in another: this will be seen as hostile action.</ref> This will be seen as enemy action, especially if your edits are not directed at ''some'' legal content, however spurious. It is also axiomatic that all [[legal mark-up]] must overcome the [[Biggs threshold]].
No such ornamentation is [[calculated]] to improve the elegance of the text, of course. To do that you will need to disentangle some convoluted grammar — perhaps by deleting an “[[as the case may be]]”.<ref> be careful not to ''add'' the same thing in one place and ''delete'' it in another: this will be seen as hostile action.</ref> This will be seen as enemy action, especially if your edits are not directed at ''some'' legal content, however spurious. It is also axiomatic that all [[legal mark-up]] must overcome the [[Biggs threshold]].
===The [[Biggs constant]]===
===The [[Biggs threshold]]===
{{bold full stop}}
{{bold full stop}}
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Anal paradox]]
*[[Anal paradox]]
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Navigation menu