LegalHub: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
328 bytes added ,  16 November 2020
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{a|devil|}}Bringing GitHub to the legal eagles. Credit to '''Graeme Johnston''' of https://www.juralio.com for the nub of this idea. So the idea is very very formative,...")
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 5: Line 5:
*Validation/authentication of text (i.e. if text is downloaded can it be corrupted??) — [[the code is law]]
*Validation/authentication of text (i.e. if text is downloaded can it be corrupted??) — [[the code is law]]
   
   
For example: publish the components of a basic [[confidentiality agreement]]. Phase (a): publish in downloadable templates in word or PDF format.
For example: publish the components of a basic [[confidentiality agreement]].
and say to everyone "have at it. help yourself."


and break out all the boilerplate - governing law, reps and warranties etc.
 
===Phase (a): publish===
*Establish platform
*Publish in downloadable templates in word or PDF format and say to everyone "have at it. help yourself." Sponsor then as XYZ content, open source. Standard agreements — NDAs etc.
*Grant pre-approved users (with low threshold) ability to do likewise
*Develop navigation methodology - metadata tags, Boolean search etc.
*Reputation management for templates
 
===Phase (b): modularise===
*Strip back and break out all the boilerplate - governing law, reps and warranties etc.
basically make an online, simple, doc assembly tool - free for anyone to use and play around with as they wish.
basically make an online, simple, doc assembly tool - free for anyone to use and play around with as they wish.
   
   
Phased approach with a series of successive goals, which depend on the last one being achieved.
Phased approach with a series of successive goals, which depend on the last one being achieved.

Navigation menu