83,357
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{g}}A guity mind, from the axiomatic Latin expression which founds the English criminal law, ''actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea''<ref>You see this often articulated as...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}A | {{g}}A guilty mind, from the axiomatic Latin expression which founds the English criminal law, ''actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea'':<ref>You see this often articulated as “actus ''reus'' non facit reum nisi mens sit rea,” but with my rudimentary grasp of Latin, that is a reus too far.</ref> “An ''act'' is not guilty unless the ''mind'' is guilty”. What counts as a guilty mind will depend on the offence, or wrong, in question. For criminal acts, it will generally be [[intention]] or [[recklessness]]; for [[strict liability]] offences and torts, more likely no more than [[gross negligence]] or [[negligence]]. Only the [[blameless inadvertence|blamelessly inadvertent]] get away unscathed, and even they can fall prey to offences of [[absolute liability]]. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[degrees of liability]] | *[[degrees of liability]] | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} |