The Singularity is Near: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 33: Line 33:


“By the end of this decade [i.e., by 2010] computers will disappear as distinct physical objects, with displays built in our eyeglasses and electronics woven into our clothing”
“By the end of this decade [i.e., by 2010] computers will disappear as distinct physical objects, with displays built in our eyeglasses and electronics woven into our clothing”
===Wither cloud computing?===
===Wh1ither cloud computing?===
On the other hand I could find scant reference to “cloud computing” or equivalent phenomena like the [[Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing]] project which spawned schemes like SETI@home in Kurzweil’s book<ref>Coda:Even that seems to have gone off the boil in the last decade. Which proves, rather than undermines, the point.</ref>. Now here is a rapidly evolving technological phenotype, for sure: hooking up thousands of serially processing computers into a massive parallel network, giving processing power way beyond any technology currently envisioned. It may be that this adaptation means we simply don’t need to incur the mental challenge of molecular transistors and so on, since there must, at some point, be an absolute limit to miniaturisation, as we approach it the marginal utility of developing the necessary technology will swan dive just as the marginal cost ascends to the heavens; whereas the parallel network involves none of those limitations. You can always hook up yet another computer, and everyone will increase performance.
On the other hand I could find scant reference to “cloud computing” or equivalent phenomena like the [[Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing]] project which spawned schemes like SETI@home in Kurzweil’s book<ref>Coda:Even that seems to have gone off the boil in the last decade. Which proves, rather than undermines, the point.</ref>. Now here is a rapidly evolving technological phenotype, for sure: hooking up thousands of serially processing computers into a massive parallel network, giving processing power way beyond any technology currently envisioned. It may be that this adaptation means we simply don’t need to incur the mental challenge of molecular transistors and so on, since there must, at some point, be an absolute limit to miniaturisation, as we approach it the marginal utility of developing the necessary technology will swan dive just as the marginal cost ascends to the heavens; whereas the parallel network involves none of those limitations. You can always hook up yet another computer, and everyone will increase performance.


Navigation menu