83,580
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 55583 by Amwelladmin (talk)) Tag: Undo |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a| | {{a|repack|{{image|Fidgety phillip|jpg|What happens if you do not concentrate on your debt extinction language}}}}Of a {{tag|contract}}, that a debtor’s obligations under it are limited to a defined pool of assets. You see this a lot in [[repackaging]]s, [[securitisation]]s and other structured transactions involving [[espievie]]s. [[Security]] and [[limited recourse]] are fundamental structural aspects of contracts with [[special purpose vehicle]]s and [[investment fund]]s. | ||
}}Of a {{tag|contract}}, that a debtor’s obligations under it are limited to a defined pool of assets. You see this a lot in [[repackaging]]s, [[securitisation]]s and other structured transactions involving [[espievie]]s. [[Security]] and [[limited recourse]] are fundamental structural aspects of contracts with [[special purpose vehicle]]s and [[investment fund]]s. | |||
===The basic idea=== | ===The basic idea=== | ||
Line 23: | Line 21: | ||
==Multi-issuance [[repackaging]] vehicles: secured, limited recourse== | ==Multi-issuance [[repackaging]] vehicles: secured, limited recourse== | ||
{{Repackaging limited recourse capsule}} | {{Repackaging limited recourse capsule}} | ||
{{limited value of security in repack}} | |||
===“[[Extinction]]” versus “[[no debt due]]”?=== | ===“[[Extinction]]” versus “[[no debt due]]”?=== | ||
{{extinction vs no debt due}} | {{extinction vs no debt due}} |