Template:M summ 2018 CSD 2(b): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(Created page with "Some observations about schoolboy errors that, I am afraid to say, readers, rather validate the concern that drafting and even comprehension standards within {{icds}} are off...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Some observations about schoolboy errors that, I am afraid to say, readers, rather validate the concern that drafting and even comprehension standards within {{icds}} are off their historical highs. We may find {{icds}} to be haughty, fastidious and pedantic — not, traditionally, seen as shortcomings even if they make the day-to-day experience in the trenches that much more like the Somme.  
[[2(b) - IM CSD Provision|Some]] observations about schoolboy errors that, I am afraid to say, readers, rather validate the concern that drafting and even comprehension standards within {{icds}} are off their historical highs. We may find {{icds}} to be haughty, fastidious and pedantic — not, traditionally, seen as shortcomings even if they make the day-to-day experience in the trenches that much more like the Somme — but, generally, [[the Squad]]’s legal ''acumen'' as been beyond reproach: standing waist-deep in mud for months on end is ''good'' for a young [[negotiator]], as long as it is in the service of justified probity.  


But, generally, [[the Squad]]’s legal acumen as been beyond reproach: standing waist-deep in mud for months on end is ''good'' for a young [[negotiator]].
But in the {{imcsd}}, we see the standard slipping. This clause is a good example:


But in the {{imcsd}} we see the standard slipping. This clause is a good example:
“'''([[present or future]])'''”: Tossed out, no doubt, as a universal redundant catch-all, it doesn’t quite work in a security charging clause. You ''can’t'', actually, grant a [[fixed charge]] over something you haven’t yet delivered into the account you are charging, you can’t identify, and which you aren’t yet — by the very theory of the game — even obliged to deliver into that account. There’s an ontological problem here. It goes deep. For how are you supposed to identify with ''any'' certainty what your [[future]] {{imcsdprov|Posted Credit Support (IM)}} will be, before it has been calculated, before it is due, before you’ve posted it, ''at all'', let alone with enough certainty for a [[fixed charge]] to attach to it, we can only wonder.


“'''([[present or future]])'''”: You can’t, actually, grant a [[fixed charge]] over something you haven’t yet delivered into the account you are charging, and which you aren’t yet — by the very theory of the game — even obliged to deliver into that account. How are you supposed to identify with ''any'' certainty the future what your {{imcsdprov|Posted Credit Support (IM)}} is before you’ve posted it, let alone with enough certainty for a fixed charge to attach to it, we can only wonder.
And is the assignment of these rights really absolute, or [[by way of security]]?

Navigation menu